VOX847 / Jim Dunlop CryBaby Wah Pedal Mods -Vox 847

Wah Wah Mods
The mods on this page are primarily concerned with the Dunlop Crybaby and Vox V847 wahs, but they can be applied to most wahs that have an inductor.
True BypassSee our other guides for True Bypass Mods for Vox and Dunlop Crybaby modelsReference Photos:

Mods to PCBThese mods are all fairly cheap to do and they're reversible, so it's not the end of the world if you don't like the results. Refer to the photos below if you're not sure which parts to change.
"Vocal Mod"Replace the 33K resistor in parallel with the inductor with a 68K. This gives a more vocal quality to the wah. Some Vox Clyde McCoy wahs had 100K resistors here.
Gain and Bass ResponseReplace the 470 ohm resistor (some have 390 or 510) at the emitter of Q1 with a lower value. This increases gain, which is useful if you've converted to true bypass. The bass response is also increased. Too low a value here may introduce some distortion and make the wah sound muddy. Try 270 - 330 ohms to start with.
MidrangeReplace the 1K5 resistor between the base of Q1 and the inductor with a larger value. This increases the midrange and helps if your wah sounds dull and muted when you rock the pedal back. Try 1K8 to 2K7. Higher values than stock also smooth out the bass-treble transition. Most people refer to the 33K as the "Q" resistor, but this resistor also affects the Q.
Sweep RangeChange the sweep by swapping the 0.01F cap between the emitter of Q2 and the inductor. A smaller value will make the wah sweep more trebly and vice-versa. If you're converting to or from a bass wah, this is the one to change. Try 0.068F for a bass wah.
VolumeIf you've converted to true bypass, replace the 68K series input resistor with a lower value, say 47K. This gives a slight increase in volume. Too low a value is likely to result in the pedal picking up radio interference. This can be addressed by adding small value (10 - 20pF) capacitors between the collector and base of each transistor.
Thanks to Abilio for the GCB95 picture.
InductorsSome of the Dunlop and Vox inductors aren't bad, but most of the recent ones I've seen have been well over 600mH, which makes the sweep too muddy for my liking. The above mods can offset this to some degree, but I regemend replacing the inductor if you want to get closer to the Page/Hendrix/Clapton/Beck wah sound. Fulltone sells a replacement inductor, modelled on the halo, but I haven't heard one to be able to gement on them. I make my own, also a copy of the halo, which I believe is as good as anything else you can buy.
In theory, you can use one side of a small transformer, but I've yet to hear any rave reviews from people who've tried one. If you can find the materials, it's quite feasible to wind your own inductor, but I wasted a lot of time before I was happy with my results.
The original halo inductors used P18/11 pot cores (18mm diameter, 11mm tall). According to information on the web, there were a few different halos, using different ferrite materials. Can inductors, Fasel inductors in '70s Italian wahs and the Thomas Organ "stack of dimes" use smaller P14/8 pot cores. I've measured the inductance and DC resistance of a few inductors, which you can find here. These data don't tell you anything about saturation or asymmetrical clipping, but I can report that the older wahs are far superior to new ones. In particular, the '60s Vox wahs with halo inductors have greater clarity and a more geplex sound at the treble end of the sweep.
Wah-Volume pedal modLifting the earth connection of the 4.7F capacitor will cancel the wah effect and leave you with a volume pedal. The '70s Jen Wah-Volume pedal switches in a 4K7 resistor and 0.22F cap in series across the 0.01F "sweep cap".
Thanks to wah-wah.co.uk
Regards,DollarBackings AdminYour #1 source for Professional Guitar Backing Tracks